Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBirdi, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorRabet, Roxana
dc.contributor.authorDurant, Steve
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Atushi
dc.contributor.authorVosoughi, Tina
dc.contributor.authorShergill, Mahek
dc.contributor.authorCostanian, Christy
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, Carolyn P.
dc.contributor.authorAli, Shehzad
dc.contributor.authorBuckeridge, David
dc.contributor.authorGhassemi, Marzyeh
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorJohn-Baptiste, Ava
dc.contributor.authorMacklin, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorMcCradden, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Kwame
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-02T22:36:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-02T22:36:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157937
dc.description.abstractBackground Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in population and public health to support epidemiological studies, surveillance, and evaluation. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify studies that use ML in population health, with a focus on its use in non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We also examine potential algorithmic biases in model design, training, and implementation, as well as efforts to mitigate these biases. Methods We searched the peer-reviewed, indexed literature using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, Inspec, Web of Science’s Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index, up to March 2022. Results The search identified 27 310 studies and 65 were included. Study aims were separated into algorithm comparison (n = 13, 20%) or disease modelling for population-health-related outputs (n = 52, 80%). We extracted data on NCD type, data sources, technical approach, possible algorithmic bias, and jurisdiction. Type 2 diabetes was the most studied NCD. The most common use of ML was for risk modeling. Mitigating bias was not extensively addressed, with most methods focused on mitigating sex-related bias. Conclusion This review examines current applications of ML in NCDs, highlighting potential biases and strategies for mitigation. Future research should focus on communicable diseases and the transferability of ML models in low and middle-income settings. Our findings can guide the development of guidelines for the equitable use of ML to improve population health outcomes.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21081-9en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleBias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBirdi, S., Rabet, R., Durant, S. et al. Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 24, 3599 (2024).en_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.identifier.mitlicensePUBLISHER_CC
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2024-12-29T04:18:11Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dspace.date.submission2024-12-29T04:18:11Z
mit.journal.volume24en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record