Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review
dc.contributor.author | Birdi, Sharon | |
dc.contributor.author | Rabet, Roxana | |
dc.contributor.author | Durant, Steve | |
dc.contributor.author | Patel, Atushi | |
dc.contributor.author | Vosoughi, Tina | |
dc.contributor.author | Shergill, Mahek | |
dc.contributor.author | Costanian, Christy | |
dc.contributor.author | Ziegler, Carolyn P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali, Shehzad | |
dc.contributor.author | Buckeridge, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghassemi, Marzyeh | |
dc.contributor.author | Gibson, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | John-Baptiste, Ava | |
dc.contributor.author | Macklin, Jillian | |
dc.contributor.author | McCradden, Melissa | |
dc.contributor.author | McKenzie, Kwame | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-02T22:36:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-02T22:36:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157937 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in population and public health to support epidemiological studies, surveillance, and evaluation. Our objective was to conduct a scoping review to identify studies that use ML in population health, with a focus on its use in non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We also examine potential algorithmic biases in model design, training, and implementation, as well as efforts to mitigate these biases. Methods We searched the peer-reviewed, indexed literature using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, Inspec, Web of Science’s Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index, up to March 2022. Results The search identified 27 310 studies and 65 were included. Study aims were separated into algorithm comparison (n = 13, 20%) or disease modelling for population-health-related outputs (n = 52, 80%). We extracted data on NCD type, data sources, technical approach, possible algorithmic bias, and jurisdiction. Type 2 diabetes was the most studied NCD. The most common use of ML was for risk modeling. Mitigating bias was not extensively addressed, with most methods focused on mitigating sex-related bias. Conclusion This review examines current applications of ML in NCDs, highlighting potential biases and strategies for mitigation. Future research should focus on communicable diseases and the transferability of ML models in low and middle-income settings. Our findings can guide the development of guidelines for the equitable use of ML to improve population health outcomes. | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21081-9 | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_US |
dc.source | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.title | Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Birdi, S., Rabet, R., Durant, S. et al. Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 24, 3599 (2024). | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | BMC Public Health | en_US |
dc.identifier.mitlicense | PUBLISHER_CC | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | en_US |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | en_US |
eprint.status | http://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerReviewed | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2024-12-29T04:18:11Z | |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | |
dspace.date.submission | 2024-12-29T04:18:11Z | |
mit.journal.volume | 24 | en_US |
mit.license | PUBLISHER_CC | |
mit.metadata.status | Authority Work and Publication Information Needed | en_US |