Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLutsko, Nicholas J
dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, Ken
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T18:36:46Z
dc.date.available2025-04-25T18:36:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/159211
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between climate models’ internal variability and their response to external forcings is investigated. Frequency-dependent regressions are performed between the outgoing top-of-atmosphere (TOA) energy fluxes and the global-mean surface temperature in the preindustrial control simulations of the CMIP5 archive. Two distinct regimes are found. At subdecadal frequencies the surface temperature and the outgoing shortwave flux are in quadrature, while the outgoing longwave flux is linearly related to temperature and acts as a negative feedback on temperature perturbations. On longer time scales the outgoing shortwave and longwave fluxes are both linearly related to temperature, with the longwave continuing to act as a negative feedback and the shortwave acting as a positive feedback on temperature variability. In addition to the different phase relationships, the two regimes can also be seen in estimates of the coherence and of the frequency-dependent regression coefficients. The frequency-dependent regression coefficients for the total cloudy-sky flux on time scales of 2.5 to 3 years are found to be strongly ( r<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> &gt; 0.6) related to the models’ equilibrium climate sensitivities (ECSs), suggesting a potential “emergent constraint” for Earth’s ECS. However, O(100) years of data are required for this relationship to become robust. A simple model for Earth’s surface temperature variability and its relationship to the TOA fluxes is used to provide a physical interpretation of these results.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1175/jcli-d-17-0736.1en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceAmerican Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.titleWhat Can the Internal Variability of CMIP5 Models Tell Us about Their Climate Sensitivity?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationLutsko, N. J., and K. Takahashi, 2018: What Can the Internal Variability of CMIP5 Models Tell Us about Their Climate Sensitivity? J. Climate, 31, 5051–5069.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Climateen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-04-25T18:30:11Z
dspace.orderedauthorsLutsko, NJ; Takahashi, Ken_US
dspace.date.submission2025-04-25T18:30:18Z
mit.journal.volume31en_US
mit.journal.issue13en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record