Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrent, Roger
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-21T23:56:44Z
dc.date.available2006-11-21T23:56:44Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-21T23:56:44Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34913
dc.descriptionA commentary from Roger Brent on synthetic biology and its relation to issues of personal responsibility and biological security.en
dc.description.abstractPeter Parker and Uncle Ben are on my mind. The reason is that is that a month ago I was jumped by Craig Venter. There were TV cameras around. The live audience was an interesting, edgy mix, on the interface between "technology", meaning computer technology, and culture/ media/ journalism; I had just given a closely prepared talk on the history, promises, and perils of biology, 20 minutes from solar system formation to origin of life to photosynthesis to agriculture to Asilomar to now; and I had paid particular attention to the existing threat from remade and lightly engineered viruses, and the various technology-empowered approaches that could contribute to a defense against unpredictable viral and bacterial pathogens. The whole set of ways the defense strategy needs to shift.en
dc.format.extent151825 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.subjectsynthetic biologyen
dc.subjectresponsibilityen
dc.titlePower and responsibilityen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineering


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record